Key takeaways
- Illusory contracts lack mutual obligation, making them unenforceable
- Vague terms, unclear commitments, and no exchange of value are red flags
- Illusory promises are non-binding statements; illusory contracts are one-sided agreements
- Unilateral contracts can be illusory if they give one party too much discretion
- Courts uphold contracts with clear, enforceable obligations, as seen in the case of Mattei v. Hopper
- Docupilot ensures contracts are legally sound with customizable templates, AI automation, and bulk generation
Contracts are meant to create legal obligations, but what happens when one party has no real commitment? What if an agreement looks solid on paper but falls apart under scrutiny?
This is where illusory contracts come in—a deceptive type of agreement that appears enforceable but lacks binding obligations.
In this guide, we’ll provide an illusory contract definition, what is an illusory promise in contract law, how it differs from a real contract, and how courts handle disputes over these agreements.
What is an Illusory Contract?
An illusory contract is an agreement that lacks mutual obligation, meaning one party retains full discretion over whether to fulfill their promised duties or obligations. Because of this, courts often deem these contracts unenforceable.
Key characteristics of an illusory contract
A contract may be illusory if it includes:
- No clear commitment: One party can choose whether or not to act
Example: A supplier agrees to provide materials "if needed," without any guarantee of an actual order
- Uncertain terms: Vague language leaves obligations undefined
Example: An employer promises a bonus "based on company success," but doesn't define how success is measured - No real consideration: There’s no actual exchange of value between parties
Example: A contract states that a company will provide services "at its discretion" without requiring payment or performance from the other party
Without mutual obligations and definitive terms, a contract may fail the enforceability test.
So, what is an illusory promise? And, how does it differ from an illusory contract?? Let’s take a closer look.
Then, What Is An Illusory Promise In Contract Law?

Say you’re selling your car, and a buyer says, “I’ll buy it if I feel like it.” Technically, they’ve said something, but have they actually committed? No. They’ve left themselves a neat little escape route. That’s an illusory promise—a statement that gives the illusion of an agreement without any real obligation.
So how does this differ from an illusory contract?
An illusory contract happens when one of these non-commitments sneaks into a formal agreement, making the entire contract shaky. If one party isn’t truly bound to do anything, the contract isn’t enforceable.
- Illusory promise: A single statement that sounds binding but isn’t
- Illusory contract: An entire agreement built around one-sided obligations
Basically, if one party can walk away whenever they want, it’s not a real contract; it’s just words on paper.
Now that we understand the concept, let’s explore real-life examples of illusory contracts.
3 Illusory Contract Example In Contract Law
Illusory contracts appear in many industries, from employment agreements to subscription services. Here are a few common examples:
- Employment agreements: If a contract states that an employee "may receive a bonus if management decides," it raises concerns. Without clear criteria or an obligation for the employer to pay, the promise lacks enforceability. However, if the contract outlines specific performance metrics or conditions for the bonus, it is not illusory
- Supply contracts: A clause stating that a company will “purchase materials as needed” may seem standard, but without specifying a minimum purchase requirement or defining what “needed” means, the supplier has no guaranteed order. Courts may deem such contracts unenforceable unless there is an obligation to buy a certain quantity or a defined purchase structure
- Subscription services: If a provider includes a clause stating, “We may change or remove services at any time without notice,” the customer could argue that there was no real commitment to provide ongoing services.
For example:
If a subscription service states, "We may change or discontinue services at any time," without providing notice or an alternative, a court may find this unenforceable because the customer has no guaranteed benefit from the contract.
However, if the contract states, "We may modify services with 30 days' notice, and customers may cancel without penalty," this is more enforceable because it provides clear conditions and protections for the customer
Contracts aren’t just about words; they require obligations. And that brings us to the two main types of contracts: bilateral and unilateral.
Unilateral contracts vs. Bilateral Contracts
Not all contracts work the same way. Some require both parties to commit upfront, while others leave one side waiting until action is taken. That’s the difference between bilateral and unilateral contracts.
Bilateral contracts: A mutual exchange
A bilateral contract is the standard agreement you see in business—both parties make binding promises to each other.
Example:
- You hire a contractor to renovate your office
- They promise to complete the work
- You promise to pay them
Since both parties are obligated, the contract is legally enforceable.
Unilateral contracts: A promise in waiting
A unilateral contract only binds one party until the other decides to act. The obligation kicks in only when performance happens.
Example:
- You offer a $500 reward for finding your lost dog
- No one is required to search, but if someone does and returns your dog, you must pay
While both unilateral and bilateral contracts can be enforceable, some unilateral contracts become illusory if they leave one party with too much discretion. For example, if a contract states, “We’ll pay a bonus if management feels like it,” it lacks a clear obligation and may not hold up in court.
But what happens when courts have to decide if a contract is enforceable? Let’s look at real-world cases.
How do Courts Typically Handle Disputes Involving Illusory Contracts?
When a dispute over an illusory contract lands in a courtroom, judges dissect every word, looking for mutual obligations, enforceability, and, most importantly, whether the contract is just an elegant way of saying “I promise, but only if I feel like it.”
The law has seen plenty of cases where one party tries to back out of a contract by arguing that there was never a real commitment in the first place.
Let’s look at a few real-life examples where courts had to decide: Is this a valid contract or just a cleverly disguised non-agreement?
#1 Mattei v. Hopper (1958)
In the 1950s, a real estate developer, Mattei, wanted to buy land from Hopper. The contract said the deal would go through only if Mattei was "satisfied" with the commercial leases he was securing. When Mattei was satisfied and ready to proceed, Hopper backed out, claiming the agreement was illusory. Since Mattei’s "satisfaction" was subjective, there was no real obligation.
The California Supreme Court disagreed. Mattei had to act in good faith when evaluating the leases. The court ruled that as long as there was an implied duty to act fairly, the contract was enforceable. In other words: a satisfaction clause isn’t a free pass to walk away if the obligation is tied to a genuine, objective standard.
#2 Miami Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. Orange Crush Co. (1936)
Now, let’s talk soda wars. Miami Coca-Cola struck a deal with Orange Crush Co., agreeing to buy syrup if they wanted to. That last part is crucial. The contract didn't specify a required amount, meaning Coca-Cola could wake up one morning and decide they didn’t feel like buying anything. Orange Crush, understandably, wasn’t thrilled when the company stopped ordering and sued for breach of contract.
The court ruled that the contract was illusory because Coca-Cola wasn’t actually obligated to buy any syrup. The agreement gave them complete discretion.
Ensure Your Contracts Hold Up in Court
Illusory contracts pose risks for businesses, leading to legal disputes and unenforceable agreements. The key to a solid, enforceable contract is mutual obligations, precise language, and clear commitments. Without these, contracts can easily fall apart when challenged in court.
How Docupilot helps create enforceable contracts
With Docupilot, businesses and legal professionals can draft contracts that are airtight, compliant, and free from illusory terms. Here’s how:
- Pre-built, customizable templates: Ensure contracts include essential clauses, like mutual obligations and consideration, reducing ambiguity and legal risks
- AI-powered document automation: Streamline contract creation with dynamic data merging, so agreements reflect clear, legally sound commitment
- Bulk contract generation: Reduce errors and eliminate uncertainty by automating bulk contract creation. Ideal for businesses handling large volumes of agreements
With Docupilot, you can draft contracts that are legally sound, clear, and enforceable, without the risk of vague, illusory terms.
Learn how to automate document creation with Docupilot

According to a Thompson Reuters, respondents who use document automation for lease agreements (22%) report that they have time to Leverage workflows to develop new business models with clients and Win new clients with better business development.